Neville's central teaching claim, and the conclusion he argues to rather than the premise he starts from. He puts it as a question - is Christ your Imagination? - and refuses to answer it by assertion. The argument runs through the definition and the test. Christ is the power and the wisdom of God; by him all things were made and without him nothing was made that was made; so if you set a goal and without raising a finger to make it so it becomes so, you can trace it back to the cause, and the cause was your imaginal act. If Christ does everything, and you know what you did, then you have found him - and you have found him as your own wonderful human Imagination. The repetition is what makes it evidence for him: I can trace to my own being an imaginal act that became fact, then I repeated it and it became fact, and if I can repeat it and these acts externalise themselves, I have found that power in myself. He is careful about the personification: the Bible calls the power Christ, personifies it, and speaks of the presence of a man, and that man is Jesus - Jesus Christ being the resurrected being who has resurrected the power within him. He also says plainly what the claim costs anyone who accepts it: if you see him on the outside, you do not see the right one. Coined 2026-09-20 under the architect's ruling on the lexicon boundary (PM 6015/6018/6056): the lexicon holds only bare identity equations that function as a dictionary gloss; a reading of a specific verse, and a teaching claim Neville argues or applies, are motifs. The test given: does he do something with it in the lecture, or does he only state it? Argued or applied means motif.