Kind
Formula
Interpretive layers
Biblical typology
Psychological interpretation

A concordance definition turned into an identification. Neville looks up the word tree in James Strong’s Concordance and reports that it is defined as the spine, the backbone, the carpenter, the gallows - and then asks the question the list invites: who is hanging on the gallows? The carpenter, that is the builder, the potter, the creator; and the tree he hangs on is the spine, the backbone. The tree of life from which man was expelled lest he eat of it before he was prepared is therefore not in a garden and not in a laboratory; it is in him. At 1879 the same four-part definition is given and pressed against the scientists who announce every week that they are closer to making life in a vial: they will never find it, and Blake is quoted for the reason - the gods of the earth and sea sought through nature to find this tree, but their search was all in vain; there grows one in the human brain. The move is characteristic of how Neville uses a concordance: not to settle a translation but to collapse a symbol onto the body.

Collections
Lectures
Own wordings
the word tree is defined as “the spine, the backbone, the carpenter, the gallows
But the tree is the spine; it is the backbone

Occurrences

I am actually nailed to a tree, but the tree, as Blake so beautifully brought out: “The gods of the earth and the sea sought through Nature to find this tree; but their search was all in vain: There grows one in the human brain”
Span from: 299
to: 527
Passage revision:
593661
Span from: -1
to: -1
Passage revision:
610847
Who is hanging on the gallows? It’s called the gallows, this word called the tree. It’s the gallows; it’s the spine, it’s the backbone, and it’s the carpenter; in other words, the builder, the potter, the creator, and there he hangs upon the tree.
Span from: 488
to: 735
Passage revision:
625310